Pauling vs. Building an In-House Pipeline

Pauling is the pipeline -- 15+ validated tools integrated end-to-end, accessible through conversation, maintained by us. Building in-house means six months stitching together AutoDock, GROMACS, RDKit, OpenBabel, and a dozen Python scripts. Then maintaining it forever.

Category Pauling In-House Pipeline
Development timeNone -- ready to use immediately6--12+ months to build, debug, and validate
Tools integratedUniDock, GROMACS, P2Rank, MolProbity, PoseBusters, ADMET profiling -- pre-wiredYou integrate each tool manually (AutoDock, GROMACS, RDKit, OpenBabel, etc.)
Maintenance burdenZero -- Pauling team handles updatesEvery dependency update can break your glue code
File format handlingAutomatic conversion across PDB, PDBQT, SDF, MOL2, CIF, SMILESYou write and maintain format converters (OpenBabel wrappers, custom parsers)
ScalingAuto-scales to 10M+ compounds on Cloud DataflowLimited by your hardware; parallelism is hand-rolled
Quality controlBuilt-in: PoseBusters pose QC, MolProbity structure validationYou implement your own QC checks -- or skip them
ReproducibilityFull job tracking -- every parameter, input, output loggedDepends on your discipline with version control and logging
Team expertise requiredConversational interface -- any bench chemist can run jobsRequires Python/Bash scripting + sysadmin + comp chem expertise
Ligand parameterizationAutomatic via ACPYPE for MDManual ACPYPE/GAFF setup per ligand
Binding energy validationMM-PBSA integrated into MD workflowYou set up gmx_MMPBSA or write your own scripts
CostPay for compute usageDeveloper salaries + compute + ongoing maintenance time
CustomizationCovers standard CADD workflows end-to-endFull control -- build exactly what you need